Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1915–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wolff v. Glickgreen1 sentence2013Here, the Supreme Court failed to comply with the require ments of Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5-a) when it determined the amount of temporary maintenance to be awarded to the wife (see Khaira v Khaira, 93 AD3d at 201 ; see also Woodford v Woodford, 100 AD3d at 876-877 ; cf. Goncalves v Goncalves, 105 AD3d at 902 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Khaira v. Khaira
green
1 sentence2013Here, the Supreme Court failed to comply with the require ments of Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5-a) when it determined the amount of temporary maintenance to be awarded to the wife (see Khaira v Khaira, 93 AD3d at 201 ; see also Woodford v Woodford, 100 AD3d at 876-877 ; cf. Goncalves v Goncalves, 105 AD3d at 902 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Goncalves v. Goncalves
green
1 sentence2013Here, the Supreme Court failed to comply with the require ments of Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (5-a) when it determined the amount of temporary maintenance to be awarded to the wife (see Khaira v Khaira, 93 AD3d at 201 ; see also Woodford v Woodford, 100 AD3d at 876-877 ; cf. Goncalves v Goncalves, 105 AD3d at 902 ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Gravenhorst v. . Zimmerman
green
1 sentence1958Decisions such as Schweitzer v. Fargo ( 255 N. Y. 60 ) and Gravenhorst v. Zimmerman ( 236 N. Y. 22 ), relied upon, decided other questions; but they did not decide this one. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Schweitzer v. Fargo
neutral
1 sentence1958Decisions such as Schweitzer v. Fargo ( 255 N. Y. 60 ) and Gravenhorst v. Zimmerman ( 236 N. Y. 22 ), relied upon, decided other questions; but they did not decide this one. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Blessing v. First National Bank
neutral
1 sentence1931In Blessing v. First National Bank of Silver Creek (supra) the action was not brought to recover for moneys on deposit with the bank, but Was upon a certificate of deposit, which is, in law, a promissory note, issued to the president of a corporation in the hands of a receiver. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Goss
neutral
1 sentence1924But even in such a case, it is held that the executor or administrator may call as a witness in his behalf the payee of such a claim, on the theory that in such a proceeding the payee is not a “ person interested in the event.” Matter of Smith, 153 N. Y. 124 ; Matter of Goss, 98 App. Div. 489 ; Matter of Mulligan, 82 Misc. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Mulligan
green
1 sentence1924But even in such a case, it is held that the executor or administrator may call as a witness in his behalf the payee of such a claim, on the theory that in such a proceeding the payee is not a “ person interested in the event.” Matter of Smith, 153 N. Y. 124 ; Matter of Goss, 98 App. Div. 489 ; Matter of Mulligan, 82 Misc. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
In Re the Accounting of Mulligan
neutral
1 sentence1924Rep. 336 ; affd., without opinion, 165 App. Div. 912 ; affd., without opinion, 216 N. Y. 720 ; Matter of Knibbs, 108 App. Div. 134 ; Matter of Lese, 176 id. 744, 746. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
In Re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Smith
neutral
1 sentence1924But even in such a case, it is held that the executor or administrator may call as a witness in his behalf the payee of such a claim, on the theory that in such a proceeding the payee is not a “ person interested in the event.” Matter of Smith, 153 N. Y. 124 ; Matter of Goss, 98 App. Div. 489 ; Matter of Mulligan, 82 Misc. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
In re the Judicial Settlement of Accounts of Executors of Estate of Knibbs
neutral
1 sentence1924Rep. 336 ; affd., without opinion, 165 App. Div. 912 ; affd., without opinion, 216 N. Y. 720 ; Matter of Knibbs, 108 App. Div. 134 ; Matter of Lese, 176 id. 744, 746. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Tiern v. Platt
neutral
1 sentence1924Rep. 336 ; affd., without opinion, 165 App. Div. 912 ; affd., without opinion, 216 N. Y. 720 ; Matter of Knibbs, 108 App. Div. 134 ; Matter of Lese, 176 id. 744, 746. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. Steuer
green
1 sentence1915Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. Steuer, 183 Mass. 140, 144 ; Thorke v. White, 188 id. 333, 334; Merseck v. Alderman, 77 Conn. 634 , 60 Atl. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Mersick v. Alderman
green
2 sentences1915Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. Steuer, 183 Mass. 140, 144 ; Thorke v. White, 188 id. 333, 334; Merseck v. Alderman, 77 Conn. 634 , 60 Atl. 1915Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. Steuer, 183 Mass. 140, 144 ; Thorke v. White, 188 id. 333, 334; Merseck v. Alderman, 77 Conn. 634 , 60 Atl. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.