Lusk v. Peck, 93 N.E. 1132 (N.Y. 1910).

Lusk v. Peck, 93 N.E. 1132 (N.Y. 1910). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) published Issue: case come within exceptionNY ↗ 0.5 score

16 citation events across 9 distinct courts.

How cited ↗

Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 16

Treatment by court

Frequently cited alongside

#1	green	Lusk v. Peck, 132 A.D. 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)	co-cited 12×
#2	green	Junkermann v. Tilyou Realty Co., 108 N.E. 190 (N.Y. 1915)	co-cited 6×
#3	green	Uggla v. Brokaw, 117 A.D. 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)	co-cited 5×
#4	green	Timlin v. Stand. Oil Co., 27 N.E. 786 (N.Y. 1891)	co-cited 4×
#5	green	Hartman v. Lowenstein, 90 Misc. 686 (N.Y. App. Term. 1915)	co-cited 4×
#6	green	McFarlane v. City of Niagara Falls, 160 N.E. 391 (N.Y. 1928)	co-cited 3×
#8	green	Barrett v. Lake Ontario Beach Improvement Co., 66 N.E. 968 (N.Y. 1903)	co-cited 3×

James L. Lusk, Respondent,
v.
Arthur R. Peck, Appellant, Impleaded With Another

New York Court of Appeals.

Sep 27, 1910.

Published opinion

93 N.E. 1132

1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1317

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Charles P. Ryan for appellant. Stewart F. Hancock for respondent.

Cited by 13 opinions | Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Geay, Haight and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Yann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Taking no part: Hiscook, J.

Your account