Mitchell v. Murray, 107 N.E. 1081 (N.Y. 1914). · Go Syfert
Search
Mitchell v. Murray, 107 N.E. 1081 (N.Y. 1914). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mary W. Mitchell Et Al., as Executors of Donald Mitchell, Deceased, Appellants,
v.
John L. Murray, Respondent, Impleaded With Others
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 15, 1914.
Published opinion
107 N.E. 1081
1914 N.Y. LEXIS 825
Walter H. Dodd and Edward H. Tatum for appellants. Norbert Heinsheimer and Henry K. Heyman for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if the original contract had not been under seal the evidence offered would not he sufficient to show that the same had been modified by a subsequent parol contract.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback, Miller and Cardozo, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.