green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guerrerio
(2×)
See United States v. Culoso, 461 F.Supp. 128 , 134 & n. 8 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd mem., 607 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Remy
See United States v. Culoso, 461 F.Supp. 128 , 134 & n. *670 8 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd mem., 607 F.2d 999 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reed
See also United States v. Culoso, 461 F.Supp. 128 , 135 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd mem., 607 F.2d 999 (1979); United States v. Elliott, 446 F.Supp. 209, 210 (W.D.Va.1978); United States v. Essex, 275 F.Supp. 393, 397 (E.D.Tenn.1967), rev'd on other grounds, 407 F.2d 214 (6th Cir.1969). 50 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Gomez
v.
Gomez
79-1098.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 13, 1979.
607 F.2d 999
Published
U. S.
v.
Gomez
No. 79-1098
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
6/13/79
1
E.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23