Billy Guice & Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Par. Prison Farm, 642 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Billy Guice & Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Par. Prison Farm, 642 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Faye L. Roth Revocable Trust v. UBS Painewebber Inc., 323 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (S.D. Fla. 2004)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 101 these considerations “are not litmus paper tests but guidelines2 citing cases1 citing court put it this way
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Billy GUICE and Howard Claxton, Sr., Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
Ray FORTENBERRY, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm, Respondent-Appellee
80-3350.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 26, 1981.
Published opinion
642 F.2d 98
1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856
George M. Strickler, Jr., N. Ann Wool-handler, Michael G. Collins, New Orleans, La., Samuel Thomas, Tallulah, La., for petitioners-appellants., James Caldwell, Dist. Atty., Tallulah, La., for respondent-appellee.
Godbold, Brown, Coleman, Ainsworth, Clark, Roney, Gee, Tjo-Flat, Hill, Fay, Rubin, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Garza, Henderson, Reavley, Pol-Itz, Hatchett, Anderson, Randall, Tate, Williams.
Published
BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.