Meroney v. B. & L. Ass'n, 17 S.E. 637 (N.C. 1893). · Go Syfert
Meroney v. B. & L. Ass'n, 17 S.E. 637 (N.C. 1893). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. S. Meroney
v.
Atlanta National Building and Loan Association and J. W. Goldsmith, Trustee.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Feb 5, 1893.
Published opinion
17 S.E. 637
J. W. Cooper for plaintiff . (845) J. W. Hinsdale and Batchelor Devereux for defendants .
PER CURIAM..
Published

If it is true, as the plaintiff alleges, that the contract set out in the complaint was made payable in the State of Georgia to avoid the usury laws of this State, that contract will be adjudged to be usurious, whatever may be the law of that State. There is, therefore, a "serious issue" between the parties which, under the rule established by Whitaker v. Hill,96 N.C. 2; Harrison v. Bray, 92 N.C. 488, and Davis v. Lassiter, ante, 128, entitles the plaintiff to have the restraining order continued in force to the hearing.

AFFIRMED.