“blackjack”
Treatment trajectory · 1931 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1931
1978
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Rodney Vinson
Thus, “[a] battery always includes an assault.” Britt, 154 S.E.2d at 521 ; Hefner, 155 S.E. at 880.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Hampton
Assault is, therefore, necessarily included in battery.”); State v. Hefner, 199 N.C. 778 , 155 S.E. 879, 880-81 (1930) (discussing a statute criminalizing “assault! ] ... inflicting] serious injury not resulting in death” and noting that, although “[a]n assault is an offer or attempt by force or violence to do injury!,] • • • every battery includes an assault [and] an assault inflicting serious injury necessarily implies a battery”)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Delis
Assault 11 is, therefore, necessarily included in battery.”); State v. Hefner, 155 S.E. 879, 880-81 (N.C. 1930) 12 (discussing a statute criminalizing “assault[] . . . inflict[ing] serious injury not resulting in death” and 13 noting that, although “[a]n ‘assault’ is an offer or attempt by force or violence to do injury[,] . . . 14 every battery includes an assault [and] an assault inflicting serious injury necessarily implies a 15 battery”).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Delis
Assault is, therefore, necessarily included in battery.”); State v. Hefner, 199 N.C. 778 , 155 S.E. 879, 880-81 (1930) (discussing a statute criminalizing “assault[ ] ... inflicting] serious injury not resulting in death” and noting that, although “[a]n ‘assault’ is an offer or attempt by force or violence to do injury[,] ... every battery includes an assault [and] an assault inflicting serious injury necessarily implies a battery”).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Bland
Perkins, Criminal Law § 2, at 81 (1957) (quoting State v. Hefner, 199 N.C. 778, 780 , 155 S.E. 879, 881 (1930)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boone
See also, State v. Hefner, 199 N.C. 778 , 155 S.E. 879 (1930); State v. Roseman, 108 N.C. 765 , 12 S.E. 1039 (1891); State v. Shelly, 98 N.C. 673 , 4 S.E. 530 (1887).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Roberts
See also State v. Hefner, 199 N.C. 778 , 155 S.E. 879 (1930); State v. Roseman, 108 N.C. 765 , 12 S.E. 1039 (1891); State v. Shelly, 98 N.C. 673 , 4 S.E. 530 (1887).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calvin Garland
v.
J. Walter Wright.
v.
J. Walter Wright.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 3, 1930.
Walter C. Berry and J. W. Pless for plaintiff.
,
McBee & McBee and T. G. Bowie for defendant.
PER CURIAM..
Published
Pee CuriaM.
The appellant has failed to show that reversible error was committed on the trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.