Keen v. Hiatt, 153 P. 861 (Okla. 1915). · Go Syfert
Keen v. Hiatt, 153 P. 861 (Okla. 1915). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Keen
v.
Hiatt
6404.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Dec 14, 1915.
Published opinion
153 P. 861
1915 Okla. LEXIS 1282
R.N. Linville, for plaintiff in error. A.A. Brown, E.L. Mitchell, and Perry Madden, for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM..
Published
PER CURIAM.

A motion has been filed to dismiss this appeal, because it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the order extending the time to make and serve a case was filed in the lower court, and the motion is supported by the affidavit of the clerk of the court that such orders were never filed in the trial court. This motion must be sustained on the authority of Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered'.