Larry Marshall v. Richard S. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 55 (8th Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Larry Marshall v. Richard S. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 55 (8th Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hidalgo-Rosa v. Colvin, 40 F. Supp. 3d 240 (D.P.R. 2014)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 56 Scope of the plain view doctrine in searches6 citing cases5 listed here
  • Hidalgo-Rosa v. Colvin, 40 F. Supp. 3d 240 (D.P.R. 2014).published
    July 13, 2011); Kon-ing v. Bowen, 675 F.Supp. 452, 457 (N.D.Ind.1987); Marshall v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 55, 56 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
  • Bettye Williams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 1 Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 289 F.3d 556 (8th Cir. 2002).published 2 cites
    Andres v. Bowen, 870 F.2d 453, 455-56 (8th Cir.1989); Marshall v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 55, 56 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
  • Hughes v. Chater, 895 F. Supp. 985 (N.D. Ill. 1995).published
    Marshall v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 55, 56 (8th Cir.1982) (per curiam) expresses the sense of frustration that sort of thing may generate.
  • Robert J. ANDRES v. Otis BOWEN, 870 F.2d 453 (8th Cir. 1989).published
    See Marshall v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 55, 56 (8th Cir.1982).
  • Andres v. Bowen, 682 F. Supp. 996 (E.D. Mo. 1988).published
    See Marshall v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 55, 56 (8th Cir.1982).
q1 “because of the importance of a complete record to proper review of social security benefits cases, we urge that those responsible for assembling and duplicating the records take particular care in order to speed consideration of these cases and to prevent remands.”2 citing cases2 citing courts quote it
At page 55 cited at this page1 citing case
  • United States v. Lionel Reifler, 446 F.3d 65 (2d Cir. 2006).published
    In United States v. Phillips, for example, the court ruled that the defendant’s act of cashing a money order that had been fraudulently wired aided and abetted the wire fraud, stating that actions taken after the scheme has been devised an…
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Larry MARSHALL, Appellant,
v.
Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary, Health & Human Services, Appellee
82-1434.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Sep 8, 1982.
Published opinion
688 F.2d 55
1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25828
J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., George W. Proctor, U. S. Atty., Frank V. Smith, III, Regional Atty., Charlene M. Seifert, Asst. Regional Atty., U. S. Dept, of Health and Human Services, Dallas, Tex., for appellee., Thomas & Nussbaum, P. A., Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.
Ross, McMillian, Davies.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant Larry Marshall’s claim for social security disability benefits was denied by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The district court [1] affirmed, finding that the Secretary’s decision was based on substantial evidence. Marshall v, Schweiker, No. LR-C-81-297 (E.D.Ark.March 30, 1982). We agree.

Our ability to review the record in this case was limited by the fact that several pages of medical records were illegible. In some circumstances this may be cause for remand. Cutler v. Weinberger, 516 F.2d 1282, 1285 (2d Cir. 1975). Here, however, there is more than enough evidence to support the Secretary’s decision and no indication that the illegible records would aid the appellant. [2] We therefore affirm on the grounds stated in the district court opinion pursuant to 8th Cir. R. 14.

1

. The Honorable William R. Overton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

2

. Because of the importance of a complete record to proper review of social security benefits cases, we urge that those responsible for assembling and duplicating the records take particular care in order to speed consideration of these cases and to prevent remands.