Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Steinmeyer
v.
Marine Hotel Corporation.
v.
Marine Hotel Corporation.
12332.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Dec 13, 1927.
Published opinion
Messrs. Logan Grace , and John I. Cosgrove , for appellant, cite: What assumption of risk may be set up as a defense: 112 S.C. 544 ; 123 S.C. 207 ; 137 S.E., 198 . Cases distinguished: 10 A.L.R., 1388; Id. , 1396; 25 L.R.A. (N.S.), 362; 110 S.C. 154 .
Messrs. Huger, Wilbur, Miller Mouzon , for respondent, cite: Assumption of risk: 10 A.L.R., 1388; 25 L.R.A. (N.S.), 362; 10 A.L.R., 1396; 39 C.J., 766; 110 S.C. 153 . Cases distinguished: 112 S.C. 541 ; 123 S.C. 199 ; 137 S.E., 198 ; 39 C.J., 945. Demurrer sustainable on facts of case: 94 S.E., 835; 110 S.C. 153 ; 58 S.C. 491 ; 80 S.C. 1 ; 64 S.C. 553 ; 69 S.C. 479 . Fundamentals of assumption of risk and contributory negligence are the same: 18 R.C.L., 675; 66 S.C. 204 .
Cothran, Watts, Messrs, Beease, Stabeer, Carter.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.The order of his Honor, Judge Feather stone, sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, is entirely satisfactory to this Court and is accordingly affirmed.
Mr. Chief Justice Watts and Messrs. Justices BeEase, Stabeer, and Carter concur.