Stewart v. Collier, 99 S.E. 838 (S.C. 1919). · Go Syfert
Search
Stewart v. Collier, 99 S.E. 838 (S.C. 1919). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Wilds, 584 S.E.2d 138 (S.C. Ct. App. 2003)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 839 cited at this page1 citing case
  • State v. Wilds, 584 S.E.2d 138 (S.C. Ct. App. 2003).published
    Yaun v. Baldridge, 243 S.C. 414, 419 , 134 S.E.2d 248, 251 (1964); State v. Caldwell, 231 S.C. 184, 188 , 98 S.E.2d 259, 261 (1957); State v. Sussewell, 149 S.C. 128, 145 , 146 S.E. 697, 703 (1929); In re McFadden, 112 S.C. 258 , 261, 99 S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re McFadden, Stewart
v.
Collier
10232.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jul 14, 1919.
Published opinion
99 S.E. 838
1919 S.C. LEXIS 138
Mr. J. Harry Foster , for appellant, submits: The automobile attached, and advertised for sale, is admittedly a part of the owner's homestead and personalty, and cannot be sold under judgment lien recovered against it under the automobile statute of 1912. Homestead is not subject to levy and sale: 99 S.C. 410 ; 28 S.C. 71 ; 32 S.C. 264 ; 73 S.C. 329 ; 26 S.C. 1 ; 24 S.C. 424 ; 37 S.C. 118 ; 107 S.C. 366 ; Code 1912, sec. 348, subdiv. 4; Const. 1895, art III, sec. 28; Code 1912, vol. I, sections 3711-3722; 106 S.C. 362 ; 69 S.C. 326 ; 14 Rich. 251; 2 S.C. 557 ; 84 S.C. 563 ; 13 Rich. 277; Cooley on Constitutional Lim. (7th Ed.), p. 127; 26 Enc. of L., 2d Ed. 280; 11 S.C. 333 ; 15 S.C. 593 ; 21 S.C. 375 , 381 . The Automobile Act of 1912, the homestead exemption statutes appearing in Code of 1912, and the Constitution of 1895, article III, sec. 28, must be construed together. Messrs. Dunlap Dunlap , for respondent, submit: The Automobile Act of 1912 was enacted by the legislature in the exercise of its police power, and is constitutional: 8 Cyc 863; 103 U.S. 344 ; 26 L.Ed. 505 ; 106 S.C. 366 ; 92 S.E. 508 (N.C.); 106 S.C. 333 .
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY..
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

July 14, 1919. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For the reasons stated by his Honor, the Circuit Judge the order of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES HYDRICK, WATTS and GAGE concur

MR. JUSTICE FRASER did not sit.

*Page 263