Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Butler, 116 S.W. 360 (Tex. 1909). · Go Syfert
Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Butler, 116 S.W. 360 (Tex. 1909). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1910 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1910 1968 2026
Cited for
116 S.W. at 363 Jurisdictional issues regarding injunction proceedings4 citing cases
  • Robert Masterson v. Diocese of Nw. Texas, No. 11-0332 (Tex. Aug. 30, 2013).published 8 cites
    In that case, property had 15 been conveyed by general warranty deed to “trustees named for the Cumberland Presbyterian Church [of Jefferson, Texas].” Id. at 361.
  • Masterson v. Diocese of Nw. Texas, 422 S.W.3d 594 (Tex. 2013).published 5 cites
    In that case, property had been conveyed by general warranty deed to “trustees named for the Cumberland Presbyterian Church [of Jefferson, Texas].” Id. at 361.
  • Williams v. Gleason, 26 S.W.3d 54 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000).published
    Id.; see Brown, 102 Tex. at 332 , 116 S.W. at 363 (“[W]hen-ever the question of discipline or of faith or ecclesiastical rule, custom or law have been decided by the highest of the[] church judicatories to which the matter has been carried…
  • Westbrook v. Penley, 231 S.W.3d 389 (Tex. 2007).published
    Minton, 297 S.W. at 621-22 ; see also Brown, 116 S.W. at 363 (“[Wjhenever the questions of discipline or of faith or ecclesiastical rule, custom or law have been decided by the highest of these church judicatories to which the matter has b…
116 S.W. at 364 Determining exclusive jurisdiction of highest church court3 citing cases
102 Tex. at 361 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • Robert Masterson v. Diocese of Nw. Texas, No. 11-0332 (Tex. Aug. 30, 2013).published 8 cites
    In that case, property had 15 been conveyed by general warranty deed to “trustees named for the Cumberland Presbyterian Church [of Jefferson, Texas].” Id. at 361.
  • Masterson v. Diocese of Nw. Texas, 422 S.W.3d 594 (Tex. 2013).published 5 cites
    In that case, property had been conveyed by general warranty deed to “trustees named for the Cumberland Presbyterian Church [of Jefferson, Texas].” Id. at 361.
102 Tex. at 364 cited at this page1 citing case
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Texas & Pacific Railway Company
v.
J. E. Butler
Application No. 6119..
Texas Supreme Court.
Mar 3, 1909.
Published opinion
116 S.W. 360
1909 Tex. LEXIS 148
Earl Conner, for applicant.
Williams.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
Mr. Justice Williams

delivered the opinion of the court.

The railroad company instituted this proceeding by presenting tq the district judge its petition for an injunction against the enfofce.ment of a judgment against it in favor of Butler in the- County Dbtift of Eastland County, on the ground that it was void for the reason that, as appeared from the record in the- cause in which it was rendered, the jury on whose verdict it was based were not sworn. The district judge granted a temporary injunction, or restraining order, the exact character of which is immaterial to the present purpose and set the application down for a hearing, and, after the hearing, refused the writ and dissolved the preliminary order. Upon appeal the Court[*323] of Civil Appeals entered its judgment vacating the order of dissolution. It is from this action that the present application is presented. "Whether the proceeding was properly commenced before the district judge or not, it is perfectly evident that it could have been brought in the County Court with an application to the county judge for the injunction. The case is therefore one in which the judgment of the •Court of Civil Appeals is final and no writ of error lies to this court.

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.