green
Positive treatment
published
22.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Cited for
At page 1100 Determining the scope of the search incident to arrest exception20 citing casesnoting 20 that an order “which dismissed the complaint but not the action . . . is not final and 21 appealable unless special circumstances demonstrate that the trial court found plaintiffs 22 could not save the action by any amendment of the complaint they could reasonably be 23 expected to make
- Kristoff, No. 2:24-cv-03395 (D. Ariz. July 10, 2026).(noting 20 that an order “which dismissed the complaint but not the action . . . is not final and 21 appealable unless special circumstances demonstrate that the trial court found plaintiffs 22 could not save the action…)
- In the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Terence Damien Kirby. United States of Am. v. Terence Damien Kirby, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Pol Brennan. United States of Am. v. Pol Brennan, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Kevin Barry John Artt. United States of Am. v. Kevin Barry John Artt, 106 F.3d 855 (9th Cir. 1997).publishedLopez v. City of Needles, 95 F.3d 20 (9th Cir.1996); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983).
- United States v. Kirby, 106 F.3d 855 (9th Cir. 1996).publishedLopez v. City of Needles, 95 F.3d 20 (9th Cir.1996); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983).
- Robert Jeffrey FARMER v. E.K. McDANIEL, 98 F.3d 1548 (9th Cir. 1996).published Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir. 1983) (per curiam), upon which Farmer relies, is inapposite because the district court in Proud dismissed the complaint but not the action.
- Ruth Lopez v. City of Needles, Ca, 95 F.3d 20 (9th Cir. 1996).publishedThis case is controlled by Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam), where we held that an order dismissing a complaint was not appealable where it was not shown that the trial court had found that the plaint…
- William Michael Neyland v. J.H. Crabtree, 86 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 1996).unpublishedSee McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1053 (9th Cir.1992); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam).
- Douglas Arthur Coupar v. Stephen Pontesso, 29 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. 1994).unpublished Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam). 4 Here, Coupar filed a complaint challenging an alleged surcharge on the cost of legal copies within the prison.
- Robert James Walton v. Janet Reno, 15 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 1993).published Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169 , 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir.1984); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam). 4 Here, the district court granted Walton in forma pauperis status but dismissed his complaint with lea…
- Joel W. Ellington, Dr. v. Nancy Becker, 995 F.2d 231 (9th Cir. 1993).unpublished Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169 , 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir.1984); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam). 4 Here, Ellington filed a complaint against a Nevada state court judge, the governor of Nevada, the Nev…
- Alaba O. Awofolu v. City of Los Angeles Rudy Carrasco, 995 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1993).unpublished Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169 , 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir.1984); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam). 4 Here, Awofolu filed a complaint against the City of Los Angeles and two individuals alleging that his…
Show 10 more citing cases
- Charles D. Dearing, Jr. v. J.D. Swinson, 990 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1993).unpublished Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam).
- Lawrence S. Krain v. Cnty. of Orange Thomas Riley Roger Stanton Gaddi Vasquez Don Roth Cecil Hicks Burl Estes, 968 F.2d 1221 (9th Cir. 1992).unpublished(finding that a dismissal for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend, is not an appealable final order)
- Dennis M. Presnell v. Seibels, Bruce & Co., 873 F.2d 1440 (4th Cir. 1989).unpublishedSee Cardio-Medical Assocs., Ltd. v. Crozer-Chester Medical Center, 721 F.2d 68 , 76-77 (3d Cir.1983); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983); Elfenbein v. Gulf & W.
- Betty Lou Allen v. Vets. Admin., 749 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1984).publishedProud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983); California v. Harvier, 700 F.2d 1217, 1218 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 82 , 78 L.Ed.2d 92 (1983).
- Alton Hornback v. United States, 60 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 1995).publishedSee Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir. 1983) (per curiam).
- Pauline Newton v. Barish Chrysler-Plymouth Med. Plan Escobar Diversified Servs., 42 F.3d 1401 (9th Cir. 1994).unpublishedSee Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983); cf. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1053-54 (9th Cir.1992).
- John Badea v. Employers Health Ins. Co. Orco Constr. Co., 26 F.3d 129 (9th Cir. 1994).unpublished See Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam).
- Norman Treddenbarger v. Yakima Cnty. Robert S. Young Cheryl Rabger Robert T. Reynods Ladonna Page, 15 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 1994).publishedSee Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983). 5 DISMISSED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
- Homer L. Brand v. United States, 942 F.2d 790 (9th Cir. 1991).unpublishedSee Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983); Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169 , 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir.1984) 2 To the extent Brand's complaint also sought a refund from the IRS, the district court correctly concluded that…
- Andrew L. Groce Betty Bethea Groce v. James S. Harrison Intra-Am. Oil & Minerals, Inc. C.B. Harison, Jr. Monticello Oil Co., 892 F.2d 83 (9th Cir. 1989).unpublishedSee Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983)
q1 “with leave to amend within 60 days.”2 citing cases
- Wmx Tech., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 1997).published
- WMX Tech., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 1997).published
Other citing cases
- Larry E. Belton, Sr. v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 107 F.3d 14 (9th Cir. 1997).unpublished
- John (Jack) A. Angello v. Jerry West, 76 F.3d 384 (9th Cir. 1996).unpublished
- Joseph A. Parise v. California High. Patrol, 892 F.2d 83 (9th Cir. 1989).unpublished
- Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Bd. of Regents, 310 S.E.2d 675 (W. Va. 1983).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John PROUD, Individually and as Next Friend of Heather Proud, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
82-4692.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 26, 1983.
Published opinion
David C. Schutter, Richard A. Marshall, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants., Michael Schatzow, Mark J. Bennett, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellee.
Browning, Wright, Wallace.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM:
This is a negligence action against the United States for injuries the minor plaintiff sustained diving into a natural pool in Haleakala National Park. The district court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend within 60 days, reasoning that Hawaii’s recreational land use law precluded relief for simple negligence. See Hawaii Rev.Stat. §§ 520-2(1), -3.
The appealed order, which dismissed the complaint but not the action, is not final and appealable unless special circumstances demonstrate that the trial court found plaintiffs could not save the action by any amendment of the complaint they could reasonably be expected to make. California v. Harvier, 700 F.2d 1217, at 1218 (9th Cir.1983).
Here, plaintiffs argued below that they could state a claim for willful or malicious failure to guard or warn. ° See Hawaii Rev. Stat. § 520-5(1). They could have saved their action by amending the complaint to make this claim explicit. It is immaterial that plaintiffs decided not to amend. The district court was not advised of that decision and no final judgment was entered.
As the exception to the rule of nonappealability was not satisfied, the order was not appealable. The appeal is dismissed.