Landry v. State, 150 S.W. 162 (Tex. Crim. App. 1912). · Go Syfert
Search
Landry v. State, 150 S.W. 162 (Tex. Crim. App. 1912). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
68 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Luevano v. Abbott, No. 3:21-cv-00119 (W.D. Tex. June 10, 2021)
Treatment trajectory · 1913 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1913 1969 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 165 op. on orig. subm.3 citing cases1 citing court put it this way
  • Luevano v. Abbott, No. 3:21-cv-00119 (W.D. Tex. June 10, 2021).
    App. 615, 623, 150 S.W. 162, 165 (1912)).
  • Vandyke, Roger Dale, 538 S.W.3d 561 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017).published 6 cites
    (op. on orig. subm.)
  • Ex Parte Giles, 502 S.W.2d 774 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973).published 4 cites
    This Court held that the act granted to such a person an unconditional pardon, Id., 150 S.W. at 165, and is nothing but an attempted conferring of the pardoning power upon the district judge and ... clothes him with all the authority in re…
At page 173 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Eisen v. State, 40 S.W.3d 628 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001).published
    See id. at 173.
Other citing cases4 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank Landry
v.
the State
No. 1970..
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jun 19, 1912.
Published opinion
150 S.W. 162
1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 515
A.S. Baskett, for appellant. C.E. Lane, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.
Prendergast.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of T… (1)
PRENDERGAST, Judge.

—The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and given a life sentence.

There is neither a statement of the facts nor bill of exceptions. The only questions attempted to be raised are by the motion for new trial. None of them are of such a nature as that we can consider them in the absence of a statement' of facts. This court uniformly, under such circumstances, holds that it must presume that the action of the lower court was in every way valid and legal.-

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge, not sitting.