Neubauer v. State, 21 S.W. 363 (Tex. Crim. App. 1893). · Go Syfert
Search
Neubauer v. State, 21 S.W. 363 (Tex. Crim. App. 1893). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Harrison v. State (texcrimapp, 1935-03-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Harrison v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1935 · signal: see · confidence high
See Neubauer v. State, 31 Texas Crim.
cited Cited "see" Williams v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1934 · signal: see · confidence high
See Neubauer v. State, 31 Texas Crim.
cited Cited "see" McDonald v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1924 · signal: see · confidence high
See Neubauer v. State, 31 Texas Crim.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Alkek v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1929 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Neubauer v. State, 31 Tex. Cr.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles Neubauer
v.
the State
No. 105..
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb 3, 1893.
21 S.W. 363
1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 153
No brief for appellant. R.L. Henry, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State, moved the court to dismiss the appeal; first, because the case originated in the Mayor's Court, and being appealed to the County Court, the fine imposed was less than $100; second, because the recognizance was fatally defective, because it did not bind the appellant to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Davidson.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
DAVIDSON, Judge.

1. The recognizance binds the appellant to “ abide the judgment of the Court of Appeals,” and was entered into by him on November 12,1892. There was at that date no such court known to the laws of this State. The recognizance should have bound the appellant to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, as required by the Act of 1892, page 38, section 32. Cummings v. The State, ante, p. 406.

2. This cause originated in the Mayor’s Court, and on appeal to the County Court defendant was fined in the sum of $5. The judgment, therefore, became final in that court. Where, on an appeal to the County Court from an inferior court, the fine imposed or judgment rendered in a criminal cause shall not exceed $100, exclusive of costs, the judgment shall be final in the County Court. The motion of the Assistant Attorney-General is sustained on both grounds, and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Hurt, P. J., concurs. Simkins, J., absent.