Shirley Kramer v. Tom Price, Judge, Cnty. Crim. Court No. 5, & Carl Thomas, Sheriff, Dallas Cnty., Texas, 716 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Shirley Kramer v. Tom Price, Judge, Cnty. Crim. Court No. 5, & Carl Thomas, Sheriff, Dallas Cnty., Texas, 716 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nuncio, Ex Parte Leonardo (texcrimapp, 2022-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nuncio, Ex Parte Leonardo
Tex. Crim. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kramer v. Price, 712 F.2d 174 (5th Cir. 1983), vacated and reh’g granted, 716 F.2d 284, 285 (5th Cir. 1983), on reh’g, 723 F.2d 1164, 1164 (5th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (en banc); Long, 931 S.W.2d 285 .
discussed Cited "see" Long v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Texas Penal Code, § 42.07(a)(7) (1993). 1 Relying primarily upon Kramer v. Price, 712 F.2d 174 (5th Cir.1988), rehearing en banc granted, 716 F.2d 284 (5th Cir.1983), grant of relief affirmed, 723 F.2d 1164 (5th Cir.1984), he argued to the Court of Appeals that the stalking provision is unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to his conduct. 2 Addressing the merits of appellant’s facial challenge, the Court of Appeals held that the statute was not vague and affirmed the conviction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shirley KRAMER, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Tom PRICE, Judge, County Criminal Court No. 5, and Carl Thomas, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas, Respondents-Appellants
82-1185.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 21, 1983.
716 F.2d 284
1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16714
Douglas M. Becker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondents-appellants., Paul J. Chitwood, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner-appellee.
Clark, Brown, Wisdom, Gee, Rubin, Reavley, Pol-Itz, Randall, Tate, Johnson, Liams, Garwood, Jolly, Higgin-Botham.
Cited by 32 opinions  |  Published
BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.