v.
State
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-16-00053-CR
MERVIN EDDIE MOORE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
McLennan County, Texas
Trial Court No. 20061057CR1
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Mervin Eddie Moore appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated in McLennan County.[1] See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.04 (West Supp. 2016). Moore was sentenced to ninety days’ incarceration. Moore was represented by appointed counsel at trial and on appeal.
Moore’s attorney on appeal has filed a brief which discusses the record and reviews the trial court proceedings in detail. The brief sets out the procedural history and summarizes the evidence elicited during the course of the proceeding. Meeting the requirements of Anders v. California, counsel has provided a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 743–
44 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509–10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel has also filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal.
Counsel provided Moore with a copy of the brief, the appellate record, and the motion to withdraw. Counsel also informed Moore of his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the record. Moore’s pro se response, if any, was due on or before June 21, 2016. Moore has not filed a pro se response, nor has he requested an extension of time in which to file such a response.
We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the clerk’s record,2 and we agree that no arguable issues support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
In the Anders context, once we determine that the appeal is frivolous, we must affirm the trial court’s judgment. See Anders, 386 U.S. 738.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.3
Ralph K. Burgess Justice Date Submitted: August 2, 2016 Date Decided: August 16, 2016 Do Not Publish