Barton v. the State, 790 S.E.2d 538 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
Barton v. the State, 790 S.E.2d 538 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Patrick Rice v. State (gactapp, 2020-03-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Patrick Rice v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 2020 · confidence medium
A sentence which is not allowed by law is void, and its illegality may not be waived.”) (citation and punctuation omitted); see also Cruz v. State, 346 Ga. App. 802 , 803 (1) ( 815 SE2d 311 ) (2018) (vacating as void sentences imposed on sexual offenses, where such sentences were inconsistent with the mandates of OCGA § 17- 10-6.2 (b)); Barton v. State, 338 Ga. App. 524, 525-526 ( 790 SE2d 538 ) (2016) (vacating as void the sentence imposed after defendant entered a negotiated guilty plea on a sexual offense count, because although the defendant’s sentence fell within the applicable statu…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ivan Cruz v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Barton v. State , 338 Ga. App. 524 , 525-526, 790 S.E.2d 538 (2016) (vacating sentence imposed after defendant entered a negotiated guilty plea because the trial court failed to impose a split sentence under OCGA § 17-10-6.2 ). 8 "[A]ny person convicted of a sexual offense shall be sentenced to a split sentence which shall include the minimum term of imprisonment specified in the Code section applicable to the offense." OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b) (2016).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul Barton
v.
State
A16A0745.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Aug 15, 2016.
790 S.E.2d 538
2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 485
Paul Barton, pro se., Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Harold W. Goldin, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Miller, McFadden, McMillian.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Miller, Presiding Judge.

This is Paul Barton’s second pro se appeal arising from his 2013 conviction for two counts of sexual battery, including one count[*525] against a child under the age of sixteen (OCGA § 16-6-22.1). [1] Barton was sentenced by the trial court to two consecutive five-year terms. Barton now appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside his sentence, contending that the trial court erred when it failed to sentence him to a split sentence, which would have included at least one year of probation, as required by OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b). We agree fully. Accordingly, we vacate Barton’s sentence and remand this case to the trial court for resentencing.

“A person convicted of the offense of sexual battery against any child under the age of 16 years shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.” OCGA § 16-6-22.1 (d).

Here, Barton entered a negotiated guilty plea to two counts of sexual battery, including one count against a child under the age of sixteen, and the trial court sentenced him to two consecutive five-yearterms. Barton’s sentence was governed by OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b), which pertinently provides:

. . . [A]ny person convicted of a sexual offense shall be sentenced to a split sen tence which shall include the minimum term of imprisonment specified in the Code section applicable to the offense. No portion of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed shall be suspended, stayed, probated, deferred, or withheld by the sentencing court and such sentence shall include, in addition to the mandatory imprisonment, an additional probated sentence of at least one year. . . .

(Emphasis supplied.) See also Hedden v. State, 288 Ga. 871, 873-874 (708 SE2d 287) (2011).

“A sentence is void if the [trial] court imposes punishment that the law does not allow.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Rooney v. State, 287 Ga. 1, 2 (2) (690 SE2d 804) (2010). The trial court had jurisdiction to correct Barton’s void sentence, and Barton was entitled to directly appeal the denial of his motion to correct his sentence. [2] Id. at 2-3 (2); see also Williams v. State, 271 Ga. 686, 689 (1) (523 SE2d 857) (1999).

In this case, the underlying offenses were two counts of sexual battery, including one count against a child under the age of sixteen;[*526] OCGA § 17-10-6.2 required the trial court to impose a split sentence that included a mandatory minimum sentence of at least five years of imprisonment and at least one year of supervised probation. Here, although Barton’s sentence fell within the applicable statutory range set forth in OCGA § 16-6-22.1, the trial court failed to impose a split sentence. See Spargo v. State, 332 Ga. App. 410, 411 (773 SE2d 35) (2015); New v. State, 327 Ga. App. 87, 108 (5) (755 SE2d 568) (2014). Consequently, we vacate Barton’s sentences for the two counts of sexual battery and remand this case for resentencing.

Decided August 15, 2016. Paul Barton, pro se. Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Harold W. Goldin, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment vacated and case remanded for resentencing.

McFadden and McMillian, JJ., concur.
1

In Barton v. State, 331 Ga. App. 887 (769 SE2d 96) (2015), this Court affirmed the denial of Barton’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

2

Barton was convicted of two crimes charged in the same indictment. Accordingly, as the trial court correctly noted, Barton is deemed to have only one conviction for recidivist purposes.