Christopher Oxendine-Bey v. R. Mitchell, 688 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2017). · Go Syfert
Christopher Oxendine-Bey v. R. Mitchell, 688 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Christopher M. OXENDINE-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R. David MITCHELL; Terry Lemon; Michael L. Brooks; John Aaron; Jane Mims; Angela Rorie; Kenneth A. Beaver; Kristopher C. Kiker; Milessia Abernathy, Defendants-Appellees
16-7362.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 3, 2017.
Unpublished opinion
688 F. App'x 182
Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lees.
Wilkinson, King, Agee.
Unpublished

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oxendine-Bey v. R. Mitchell, [*183] No. 3:14-cv-00651-FDW, 2016 WL 4646447 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED