Benzies v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 150 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2017). · Go Syfert
Benzies v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 150 A.D.3d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leslie Benzies, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Et Al., Appellants-Respondents
4107 651920/16.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 25, 2017.
Published opinion
150 A.D.3d 600
Tom, Sweeny, Richter, Kapnick, Webber.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Appeal and cross appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered December 22, 2016, which granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

After defendants submitted papers on their appeal, but before plaintiff submitted papers on his opposition and cross[*601] appeal, plaintiff filed an amended complaint before Supreme Court. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint is pending before Supreme Court. We take judicial notice of the amended complaint (see Assured Guar. [UK] Ltd. v J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt. Inc., 80 AD3d 293, 303 [1st Dept 2010], affd 18 NY3d 341 [2011]), and find that it renders the present appeals moot (see Federated Project & Trade Fin. Core Fund v Amerra Agri Fund, LP, 106 AD3d 467 [1st Dept 2013]; 100 Hudson Tenants Corp. v Laber, 98 AD2d 692, 692 [1st Dept 1983]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.