United States v. Wilson Dario Mira-Londono, No. 04-14553 (11th Cir. May 19, 2005). · Go Syfert
United States v. Wilson Dario Mira-Londono, No. 04-14553 (11th Cir. May 19, 2005). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Wilson Dario Mira-Londono
04-14553.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
May 19, 2005.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-14553 May 19, 2005
THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar
CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 04-20194-CR-JAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILSON DARIO MIRA-LONDONO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida

(May 19, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Wilson Dario Mira-Londono appeals his 58-month sentence for importation of 100 grams of more of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(b)(2). On appeal, Mira-Londono argues that he should have been given a two-level minor-role reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, contending that, as a courier, he played a minor role relative to other participants in the drug-smuggling conspiracy.

In his initial brief, Mira-Londono also raised a challenge to his sentence based on Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. __, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). In his reply brief, however, Mira-Londono expressly withdrew that issue from our consideration. Therefore, we express no opinion on the merits of that claim, and we do not consider the application of United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), to this appeal. See United States v. Lebovitz, 401 F.3d 1263, 1265 n.1 (11th Cir. 2005). We otherwise find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.