Elliott v. Resurgens, P.C. Et Al., 804 S.E.2d 696 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Elliott v. Resurgens, P.C. Et Al., 804 S.E.2d 696 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: MACMASTER v. the STATE. (gactapp, 2018-01-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" MACMASTER v. the STATE.
Ga. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Szopinski v. State , 342 Ga. App. 647 , 650 (1), 804 S.E.2d 657 (2017) ; Brooks v. State , 187 Ga. App. 194 , 195 (1), 369 S.E.2d 801 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jesus De La Paz
Ga. Ct. App. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Meiklejohn v. State, 281 Ga. App. 712, 714 ( 637 SE2d 117 ) (2006) (noting that “until the [blood] testing is performed, the state may not know the exact nature of the 6 violation” of OCGA § 40-6-391), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Osterloh, 342 Ga. App. 668 , 672 n.16 ( 804 SE2d 696 ) (2017).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sean M. Elliott
v.
Resurgens, P.C., D/B/A Resurgens Orthopaedics
A15A2275.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Aug 28, 2017.
804 S.E.2d 696
2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 392
Andy Clark Law, M. Andrew Clark; Eric J. Hertz, PC., Eric J. Hertz, for appellant., Weathington Smith, PaulE. Weathington, C. Matthew Smith, for appellees.
Dillard, Ellington, Mercier.
Published
Dillard, Chief Judge.

In Resurgens, P.C. v. Elliott, 301 Ga. 589 (800 SE2d 580) (2017), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed our previous decision in Elliott v. Resurgens, P.C., 336 Ga. App. 217 (782 SE2d 867) (2016), in which we reversed a jury verdict in favor of Resurgens, P.C. d/b/a Resurgens Orthopedics and Tapan K. Daftari, M.D., in Sean Elliott’s medical-malpractice action against them. Specifically, the Supreme Court of Georgia disagreed with our conclusion that the trial court’s exclusion of certain witness testimony required reversal of the jury’s verdict and held that the judgment below should be affirmed. Accordingly, we adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia as our own, and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, P. J., and Mercier, J., concur.