Barbara Burns v. Sudhir Goyal, 30 N.Y.3d 956 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Barbara Burns v. Sudhir Goyal, 30 N.Y.3d 956 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matthis v. Hall, 173 A.D.3d 1162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2019)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barbara Burns
v.
Sudhir Goyal
138 SSM 22.
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 12, 2017.
Published opinion
✓ 30 N.Y.3d 956 recovered from 1 citing opinion
Published

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 138 SSM 22 Barbara Burns, &c., Appellant, v. Sudhir Goyal, et al., Defendants, Rakesh B. Patel, et al., Respondents.

Submitted by Frank N. Ambrosino, for appellant. Submitted by Christopher Simone, for respondents Patel et al.

Submitted by Vincent Petrozzo, for respondents Torelli et al.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

[*~956–958]

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order modified, with costs to plaintiff against defendants Rakesh B. Patel and Suffolk Heart Group, LLP and to defendants Michael Torelli and South Shore Family Practice Associates, P.C. against plaintiff, by denying the motion of defendants Rakesh B. Patel and Suffolk Heart Group, LLP for summary judgment and, as so modified, affirmed. On this record, triable questions of fact preclude summary judgment in favor of these defendants. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided October 12, 2017