Sakow v. Waldman, 155 A.D.3d 1078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2017). · Go Syfert
Sakow v. Waldman, 155 A.D.3d 1078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 1080 Estate's status regarding ownership of shares1 citing case
  • Owen v. Hurlbut, 240 A.D.3d 1199 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2025).published
    At the time the action was commenced, the estate was neither a holder of ROHM shares nor a holder of a beneficial interest therein ( see Business Corporation Law § 626 [a], [b]; Sakow v Waldman , 155 AD3d 1078, 1080 [2d Dept 2017]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walter Sakow, Individually and on Behalf of Mawash Realty Corp., Respondent,
v.
Michael Waldman, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Sherwood Waldman, Deceased, Defendant, and Mawash Realty Corp., Appellant
2015-08507.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Nov 29, 2017.
Published opinion
155 A.D.3d 1078
Leventhal, Austin, Cohen, Nelson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.), entered June 18, 2015, and (2) a money judgment of that court entered September 8, 2015. The order granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 626 (e) for an award of an attorney’s fee. The money judgment, upon the order, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the nominal defendant, Mawash Realty Corp., in the total sum of $324,204.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order was superseded by the money judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the money judgment is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the money judgment was vacated by a subsequent order of the same court entered February 18, 2016, made upon renewal (see Sakow v Waldman, 155 AD3d 1078 [2017] [decided herewith]).

Leventhal, J.R, Austin, Cohen and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.