Commonwealth v. McClelland, D., 179 A.3d 2 (Pa. 2018). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. McClelland, D., 179 A.3d 2 (Pa. 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Harris, R., 315 A.3d 26 (Pa. 2024)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 3 Requirement for due process in adjudication based on hearsay4 citing cases“fundamental due process requires that no adjudication be based solely on hearsay evidence”1 citing court quotes it · 2 listed here
  • Commonwealth v. Harris, R., 315 A.3d 26 (Pa. 2024).published 2 cites
    Commonwealth v. McClelland, 179 A.3d 2, 3 (Pa. 2018) (per curiam).
  • Com. v. Dolan, M., 241 A.3d 1291, 2020 PA Super 257 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).published 2 cites
    “fundamental due process requires that no adjudication be based solely on hearsay evidence”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Donald J. MCCLELLAND, Petitioner
252 WAL 2017 (Granted).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 11, 2018.
Published opinion
179 A.3d 2
Per Curiam.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, slightly rephrased for clarity, is:

[W]hether the Superior Court panel failed to properly apply and follow the legal precedent set forth in Commonwealth ex rel. Buchanan v. Verbonitz, [ 525 Pa. 413 ] 581 A.[2d]3d 172, 174-76 (Pa. 1990) in which five (5) Justices held that "fundamental due process requires that no adjudication be based solely on hearsay evidence."