Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Krolicki Wholesale Meats, Inc., 763 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Krolicki Wholesale Meats, Inc., 763 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
KROLICKI WHOLESALE MEATS, INC., Respondent
84-5682.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 5, 1985.
Published opinion
763 F.2d 215
1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31344
Ellen 0. Boardman (argued), Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Howard E. Perlstein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner., David A. McKinnon (argued), Bieber, Brennan, Matranga, McKinnon, Sable & Cross, Mt. Clemens, Mich., for respondent.
Lively, Jones, Celebrezze.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The Union, Local 26 of the United Food and Commercial Workers, AFL-CIO, filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board against the employer, Krolicki Wholesale Meats, Inc., alleging a refusal to bargain in good faith and interference with the employees’ rights under the National Relations Act when it discharged five employees after they voiced dissatisfaction with the collective bargaining agreement. The ALJ found that the employer had violated section 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of the Act. The employer filed exceptions and the ALJ filed his final order affirming his earlier decision. The Board adopted his findings and has petitioned for enforcement of its order.

This Court’s function is limited to determining whether there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s findings. NLRB v. Walton Mfg. Co., 369 U.S. 404, 405, 82 S.Ct. 853, 854, 7 L.Ed.2d 829 (1962). Having reviewed the record as a whole, we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings.

Accordingly, the order of the Board is hereby Enforced.