neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
0.7 score
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the INTEREST OF D.V.A. Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
20180166.
North Dakota Supreme Court.
Dec 6, 2018.
Published opinion
Ryan A. Keefe (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellee., Kent M. Morrow (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from treatment and finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues the district court erred in denying his application for discharge because the order is not supported by sufficient evidence that he would likely engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct placing others in danger under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(9). The district court's findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte