No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alexis Adrian GUZMAN-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Alexis Adrian GUZMAN-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
06-10491.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 8, 2006.
Unpublished opinion
198 F. App'x 388
Sarah Ruth Saldana, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Jason Douglas Hawkins, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
King, Garwood, Jolly.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM:
*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alexis Adrian Guzman-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.