At page 546 after noticing strange ether odor, officers obtained driver's consent to search vehicle, saw screws holding speakers were stripped, retrieved screwdriver from glove box, removed screws and speakers and ultimately discovered cocaine underneath3 citing cases
- Pueblo v. Santiago Alicea, 138 P.R. Dec. 230 (1995).publishedAl examinar el ambiente en el cual se prestó el consenti-miento, los tribunales deben examinar si la persona que con-sintió: “(1) estaba detenida o fue interrogada por un período largo o corto de tiempo, Bustamonte , 412 U.S., pág. 226, 93…
- United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez & Amador Rodriguez, 906 F.2d 377 (8th Cir. 1990).published In examining the environment in which consent was given, courts should ask whether the person who consented: (1) was detained and questioned for a long or short time, Bustamonte, 412 U.S. at 226 , 93 S.Ct. at 2047 ; (2) was threatened, phy…
- United States v. Lorgio D. Morales, Jr. United States of Am. v. Luis L. Viera. United States of Am. v. Luis L. Viera, 861 F.2d 396 (3d Cir. 1988).published(after noticing strange ether odor, officers obtained driver's consent to search vehicle, saw screws holding speakers were stripped, retrieved screwdriver from glove box, removed screws and speakers and ultimately discov…)
At page 548 cited at this page3 citing cases
- United States v. Crescenciano M. Pena, 920 F.2d 1509 (10th Cir. 1990).publishedLopez, 777 F.2d at 548.
- United States v. Tersea Adela Ashby, 864 F.2d 690 (10th Cir. 1988).publishedUnited States v. Lopez, 777 F.2d at 548.
- United States v. Martinez, 696 F. Supp. 2d 1216 (D.N.M. 2010).publishedSee United States v. Lopez, 777 F.2d at 548.
At page 551 cited at this page1 citing case
- State v. Pena, 779 P.2d 538 (N.M. 1989).published"More specifically, probable cause must be evaluated in relation to the circumstances as they would have appeared to a prudent, cautious and trained police officer." Lopez, 777 F.2d at 551.
Other citing cases
- Hohn v. United States, No. 2:19-cv-02082 (D. Kan. Dec. 9, 2021).
- In re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litig., No. 2:19-cv-02491 (D. Kan. Dec. 9, 2021).
- United States v. Rychener, 144 F. App'x 589 (9th Cir. 2005).unpublished
- United States v. Jesus Felix-Rodriguez, 24 F.3d 250 (9th Cir. 1994).published
- United States v. Florentino Lopez-Felix, United States of Am. v. Miguel De Los Rios-Salcedo, 21 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 1994).unpublished
- United States v. Juan Paul Robertson, United States of Am. v. Juan Paul Robertson, 15 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. 1994).published
- United States v. Ronald L. Lingenfelter, United States of Am. v. Gary Marolf, AKA Gary Marlow, United States of Am. v. Lawrence Morgan, 997 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1993).published
- United States v. Ositadima Igbo, & Phillip Chukwurah, 993 F.2d 885 (9th Cir. 1993).unpublished
- United States v. George Pomales, 990 F.2d 1264 (9th Cir. 1993).unpublished
- United States v. Hector Martin Ramos, 923 F.2d 1346 (9th Cir. 1991).published
Show 10 more citing cases
- United States v. Bradford L. Lockett, 919 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1990).published
- United States v. Anthony Alexander, 846 F.2d 74 (4th Cir. 1988).unpublished
- United States v. Jorge Juan Restrepo-Rua, 815 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1987).published
- United States v. Roger Nordling, 804 F.2d 1466 (9th Cir. 1986).published
- People v. Grimes, 378 P.3d 320 (Cal. 2016).published
- United States v. Michael Lustig, 830 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2016).published
- United States v. Paul Eugene Mason, 52 F.3d 1286 (4th Cir. 1995).published
- United States v. Steven Lester Marts Pamela Sue Marts, 986 F.2d 1216 (8th Cir. 1993).published
- United States v. Richard Batiste, 868 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir. 1989).published
- People v. Unruh, 713 P.2d 370 (Colo. 1986).published
v.
Dario Dicesare, United States of America v. Kathleen Flannery, United States of America v. Jose Marin
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dario DiCESARE, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kathleen FLANNERY, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose MARIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 84-5013, 85-5021 and 84-5056.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 2, 1985.
Christine W.S. Byrd, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Stanley I. Greenberg, Los Angeles, Cal., Manuel Araujo, Santa Ana, Cal., for defendants-appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The opinion filed in the above case on July 10, 1985, and reported at 765 F.2d 890, is amended as follows:
The second full paragraph, left hand column, on page 901 of 765 F.2d is hereby deleted, and the following is inserted in its place:
We affirm DiCesare's conviction and vacate Marin's conviction and remand for a new trial. Since Flannery entered a conditional guilty plea pursuant to rule 11(a)(2), Fed.R.Crim.P., and has prevailed on appeal from the district court's denial of her pretrial motions for evidentiary hearings on the August and September entries, we vacate her conviction and remand so that she may withdraw her conditional guilty plea and stand trial. Since we find no merit to any of Flannery's other assigned errors, if she does not withdraw her plea and the district court finds, after a hearing, that the officers complied with the knock and announce statute or that their compliance was excused, the district court may re-enter the judgment of her conviction.