United States v. Conklin Wallace, 783 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
United States v. Conklin Wallace, 783 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Chan v. Society Expeditions, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Teixeira v. Van Camp Seafood Co., 783 F.2d 951, 953 (9th Cir.1986); Kilkenny, 800 F.2d at 859 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee,
v.
Conklin WALLACE, Petitioner-Appellant
85-5560.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 26, 1986.
783 F.2d 951
Janet Goldstein, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for U.S., Ryan D. McCortney, Noel M. Ragsdale, Los Angeles, Cal., for Wallace.
Browning, Goodwin, Wallace, Sneed, Kennedy, Anderson, Hug, Tang, Sko-Pil, Schroeder, Fletcher, Farris, Pregerson, Alarcon, Poole, Ferguson, Nelson, Canby, Booc-Hever, Norris, Reinhardt, Beezer, Hall, Wiggins, Brunetti, Kozinski, Noonan, Thompson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.