No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Maria Ester ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Maria Ester ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant
05-13577.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 26, 2006.
Unpublished opinion
178 F. App'x 889
Douglas Molloy, Fort Myers, FL, Tamra Phipps, Judy K. Hunt, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Mark G. Rodriguez, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Carnes, Wilson, Pryor.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM:
Mark G. Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Maria Ester Ortiz, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ortiz’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.