green
Positive treatment
published
Issue: non-waivable challengePA ↗
Issue: may entertain challengePA ↗
Quoted verbatim 4×
32.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2021 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2021
2023
2026
Cited for
Because [the defendant] challenges the trial court’s authority to -2- impose costs..., we conclude that the [defendant’s] claim implicates the legality of his sentence[.]
- Com. v. Cezaire, R., No. 996 EDA 2019 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 2021).unpublished(Because [the defendant] challenges the trial court’s authority to -2- impose costs..., we conclude that the [defendant’s] claim implicates the legality of his sentence[.])
- Com. v. Chapin, W., No. 978 EDA 2020 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 22, 2021).unpublished(Because [the defendant] challenges the trial court’s authority to impose costs . . . , we conclude that the [defendant’s] claim implicates the legality of his sentence[.])
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“because the defendant challenges the trial court's authority to -2- impose costs..., we conclude that the defendant's claim implicates the legality of his sentence.”
- Com. v. Cezaire, R., No. 996 EDA 2019 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 2021).unpublished“because the defendant challenges the trial court's authority to -2- impose costs..., we conclude that the defendant's claim implicates the legality of his sentence.”
- Com. v. Chapin, W., No. 978 EDA 2020 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 22, 2021).unpublished“because the defendant challenges the trial court's authority to impose costs . . . , we conclude that the defendant's claim implicates the legality of his sentence.”
- Com. v. Snyder, C., 251 A.3d 782, 2021 PA Super 63 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).published “because the defendant challenges the trial court's authority to impose costs . . . , we conclude that the defendant's claim implicates the legality of his sentence.”
Other citing cases
- Com. v. Gibbs, A., No. 3426 EDA 2019 (Pa. Super. Ct. Dec. 23, 2021).unpublished
- Com. v. Kulp, M., No. 2125 EDA 2020 (Pa. Super. Ct. July 30, 2021).unpublished
- Com. v. Rojas-Rolon, V., 2021 PA Super 103.published
- Com. v. Johnson, N., No. 522 EDA 2019 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 30, 2021).unpublished
- Com. v. Johnson, N., No. 2410 EDA 2018 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 30, 2021).unpublished
- Com. v. Parler, D., No. 1058 EDA 2020 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 21, 2021).unpublished
- Com. v. Legette, S., No. 1045 EDA 2020 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 15, 2021).unpublished
- Com. v. Patel, D., No. 1218 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 13, 2026).unpublished
- Com. v. Pilling, D., No. 2121 EDA 2018 (Pa. Super. Ct. May 17, 2021).unpublished
- Com. v. Allen, T., No. 817 EDA 2019 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 20, 2021).unpublished
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commonwealth
v.
Lehman, R., Pet
v.
Lehman, R., Pet
136 WAL 2020.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 25, 2020.
Published opinion
✓
243 A.3d 7 recovered from 9 citing opinions
Published
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICTORDER
[*~7–10]WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,Respondentv.RONNIE LEHMAN,Petitioner
No. 136 WAL 2020Petition for Allowance of Appealfrom the Order of the Superior Court
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
[*~8–10]DENIED.