Fortec Constructors v. United States, 804 F.2d 141 (Fed. Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Fortec Constructors v. United States, 804 F.2d 141 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: PCL Constr. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 479 (Fed. Cl. 2002)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fortec Constructors, Etc.
v.
The United States
86-960.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Oct 31, 1986.
Published opinion
804 F.2d 141
1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20381
Published

804 F.2d 141

FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS, etc., et al., Appellees,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellant.

Appeal No. 86-960.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1986.

Joseph T. Casey, Jr., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director. James R. Thornton, Jr., Dept. of the Army, Savannah, Georgia, of counsel.

David W. Mockbee, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, Jackson, Miss., argued for appellee.

Before RICH, SMITH, and NIES, Circuit Judges.

NIES, Circuit Judge.

[*~141–143]1

The United States appeals from the final judgment of the United States Claims Court, reported at 8 Cl.Ct. 490 (1985), awarding Fortec Constructors delay damages, an extension of contract time, interest, and costs. We affirm.

OPINION

[*~142–143]2

Upon consideration of each of the government's arguments, we conclude that the government has failed to establish any error in the court's analysis. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Yock's opinion.

3

AFFIRMED.