green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lusk v. Foxmeyer Health Corp.
See Greason, 650 F.Supp. at 5 (failure to adduce evidence of which entity the common decision-maker represented required summary judgment on single employer issue), aff'd, 813 F.2d 410 (11th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lusk v. Foxmeyer Health Corp.
See Greason, 650 F.Supp. at 5 (failure to adduce evidence of which entity the common decision-maker represented required summary judgment on single employer issue), aff'd, 813 F.2d 410 (11th Cir.1987). 19 When pressed at oral argument to identify evidence in the record from which we could reasonably infer that Anderson, Butler, and Estrin were acting on NII's behalf in approving the RIF plan, the appellants made two basic arguments.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grimes
v.
Bowen
v.
Bowen
86-8340.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Feb 23, 1987.
813 F.2d 410
Published
*Grimes
v.
Bowen
86-8340
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
2/23/87
1
M.D.Ga.
AFFIRMED
2
---------------
* Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 23.