United States v. Griffin, No. 20-60768 (5th Cir. Mar. 19, 2021). · Go Syfert
United States v. Griffin, No. 20-60768 (5th Cir. Mar. 19, 2021). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Griffin
20-60768.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 19, 2021.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished  |  Direct Criminal
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED
March 19, 2021
No. 20-60768
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Timothy Griffin,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:19-CR-18-5

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Timothy Griffin appeals his sentence after pleading guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine. Griffin challenges the district court’s application of the career offender enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Seeking to enforce

*

Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Griffin’s appeal waiver, the Government moves to dismiss the appeal and alternatively moves for summary affirmance.

We review the enforceability of an appeal waiver de novo. United States v. Winchel, 896 F.3d 387, 388 (5th Cir. 2018). Based on our review of the record, Griffin knowingly and voluntarily entered his plea agreement, including the appeal waiver, which is enforceable and bars his appeal. See United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544-45 (5th Cir. 2005). Griffin’s argument that the waiver should not be enforced because he agreed to it without knowledge of the specific sentence to be imposed is unavailing. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and its alternative motion for summary affirmance is DENIED as unnecessary.

APPEAL DISMISSED.