Murphy v. Ross, 26 P. 222 (Wash. 1891). · Go Syfert
Murphy v. Ross, 26 P. 222 (Wash. 1891). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Michael Murphy
v.
Hugh Ross
No. 171.
Washington Supreme Court.
Mar 13, 1891.
Published opinion
26 P. 222
1891 Wash. LEXIS 44
Fred T. Peet, and Snell & Bedford, for appellant., Joseph Sessions, for appellee.
Anders, Dunbar, Hoyt, Scott, Stiles.
Published

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

— This is a motion to dismiss an appeal for the reason that appellant has not perfected his appeal within the time prescribed by law and the rules of this court, and affidavits and counter-affidavits are filed in support of and opposed to the motion. We do not think that the affidavit of appellant’s attorney shows any legal or reasonable excuse for the failure. It follows that the motion will be sustained and the appeal dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Anders, C. J., and Scott, Hoyt, and Stiles, JJ., concur.