Treatment trajectory · 1905 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1905
1965
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
T. J. Cusick
v.
Robert Beyers
v.
Robert Beyers
No. 644.
Washington Supreme Court.
Oct 20, 1892.
Pendergast <& Malloy, for appellant., Canton, Berry <& Gabon, for respondent.
Anders, Dunbar, Hoyt, Scott, Stiles.
Published
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal because no notice thereof was given. Several days after[*99] the rendition of judgment it appears by a journal entry that appellant attempted to give notice of appeal orally in open court. The statute makes no provision for such a notice. A notice given in open court must be given at the time judgment is rendered, and it not appearing that the respondent was even present at the time, or that he had any notice of the appeal in fact, the motion to dismiss must be granted.
Anders, C. J., and Stiles, Dunbar and Hoyt, JJ., concur.