Hamilton Bros. Oil Co. v. Anr Pipeline Co., 828 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Hamilton Bros. Oil Co. v. Anr Pipeline Co., 828 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HAMILTON BROTHERS OIL COMPANY and Hamilton Brothers Petroleum Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ANR PIPELINE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
86-6014.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 8, 1987.
Published opinion
828 F.2d 1133
1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13334
Hayden Burns, Paul F. Simpson, Butler & Binion, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants., B. Thomas Cook, Robert C. Williams, Bracewell & Patterson, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Rubin, Garza, Jones.
Published
PER CURIAM:

This court assumed it might have jurisdiction of the appeal based on consideration of the stay order as a collateral order having final effect. See Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The district court having vacated that order, we decline to review other rulings that are interlocutory and not appealable. The appeal is therefore dismissed as moot with respect to the stay order, without prejudice as to any other issues.