Roth v. Roth, 156 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Roth v. Roth, 156 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Kathleen W. ROTH
v.
Howard H. ROTH
No. 3601.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 9, 1963.
Published opinion
156 So. 2d 663
Joseph S. Rodriquez, St. Petersburg, for appellant., Jack Clark, of Harris, Wing, Clark & Green, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
Allen, Shannon, White.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The appellant, in the conclusion of her brief, states:

“In view of the misconception of law by the lower Court, this cause should, be remanded with instructions to find the defendant in contempt, to take testimony as to attorney’s fees, to award petitioner’s attorney a reasonable fee and to modify the Property Settlement Agreement.”

We find no error in the order of the trial judge refusing to find appellee in contempt so we affirm and also deny any attorneys’ fees in this case.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.