Hart v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 156 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Hart v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 156 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Harold S. HART
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 63-11.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 8, 1963.
Published opinion
156 So. 2d 668
James C. Shepherd, Coconut Grove, for appellant., Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and John W. Thornton, Miami, for appellee.
Hendry, Horton, Pearson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

By this appeal the appellant, who was plaintiff in the trial court, seeks a reversal of a summary final judgment for the defendant. The judgment was based upon the conclusion of the trial judge that appellant’s claims for medical payments were not covered by the medical payments provisions of a policy of insurance issued by defendant. We have examined the provisions of the policy in the light of the circumstances of plaintiff’s injury and hold that the trial[*669] judge correctly construed the provisions of the policy under which claim was made. Cf., Merchants Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 187 Miss. 301, 188 So. 571, 192 So. 566 (1939); Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co., 252 Iowa 97, 106 N.W.2d 86 (1960).

Affirmed.