Blanco v. Monique & Me, Inc., 116 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). · Go Syfert
Blanco v. Monique & Me, Inc., 116 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marlena BLANCO
v.
MONIQUE & ME, INC. d/b/a Culinary Specialty Food and CWF Warehouse, LLC
No. 3D12-2887.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 3, 2013.
Published opinion
116 So. 3d 639
2013 WL 3336893
2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10597
Remer & Georges-Pierre and Carlo D. Marichal and Anthony M. Georges-Pierre, Miami, for appellant., Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Cole & Boniske and Brett J. Schneider and Eric P. Hockman; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton and Jonathan Stoler and Eric Raphan, New York, for appellees.
Only, Shepherd, Suarez, Wells.
Published
SUAREZ, J.

Marlena Blanco seeks to reverse the trial court’s order granting the appellee-defendants’, Monique & Me, Inc., d/b/a Culinary Specialty Food and CWF Warehouse, LLC, motion to dismiss with prejudice. Blanco brought an action against her employers under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA), sections 760.01-11, 509.092, Florida Statutes (2010), after her termination, alleging employment discrimination based on pregnancy. Because the State of Florida has not chosen to include a prohibition against pregnancy-based discrimination under the FCRA, we reluctantly affirm, following this Court’s precedent in Delva v. Continental Group, Inc., 96 So.3d 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), review granted, No. SC12-2315 (Fla. May 2, 2013).

Affirmed.

SHEPHERD, C.J., concurs. WELLS, J., concurs in results only.