United States v. Henao, 231 F. App'x 360 (5th Cir. 2007). · Go Syfert
United States v. Henao, 231 F. App'x 360 (5th Cir. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jesus Andres Cardona HENAO, Defendant-Appellant
05-21077.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 19, 2007.
Unpublished opinion
231 F. App'x 360
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee., Joe L. Hernandez, Hernandez & Associates, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jones, Jolly, Dennis.
Unpublished
[*361] PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Andres Cardona Henao appeals the sentence that he received after he pleaded guilty to possessing and importing more than 100 grams of heroin with intent to distribute. Henao argues that the district court failed to make the requisite findings when it attributed a co-defendant’s quantity of heroin to him as reasonably foreseeable. The district court’s finding that the heroin was reasonably foreseeable to Henao is not clearly erroneous as it is plausible in light of the record as a whole. See United States v. Cooper, 274 F.3d 230, 241 (5th Cir.2001); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(l)(B).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.