Commonwealth v. Tate, 734 A.2d 1279 (Pa. 1999). · Go Syfert
Commonwealth v. Tate, 734 A.2d 1279 (Pa. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Landon TATE, Jr.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 8, 1999.
Published opinion
734 A.2d 1279
Mark D. Waitlevertch, Meadville, Debra S. Higgins, Paoli, Paula C. DiGiacomo, for Com., Bruce A. Barrett, Meadville, for Landon Tate, Jr., Karl Baker, Philadelphia, for Amicus Curiae (Tate)., Gary Neil Asteak, Easton, for Amicus-Defender Ass’n., Stefan Presser, Philadelphia, for ACLU.
Cappy, Castille, Flaherty, Newman, Nigro, Saylor, Zappala.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our disposition in Commonwealth v. Williams, — Pa.-, 733 A.2d 593 (1999), we affirm the Order of the Crawford County Court of Common Pleas dated October 22, 1997. Furthermore, we remand the matter to the common pleas court for disposition of any remaining issues.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.