Commonwealth v. Smoczylo, 64 A.3d 626 (Pa. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. Smoczylo, 64 A.3d 626 (Pa. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Callender, G. v. Brighton Mach. Co., No. 755 WDA 2013 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 17, 2014)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 626 Considering replacement of strict liability analysis2 citing casesgranting review on the question: “Whether this Court should replace the strict liability analysis of Section 402A of the Second Restatement with the analysis of the Third Restatement1 citing court put it this way
  • Callender, G. v. Brighton Mach. Co., No. 755 WDA 2013 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 17, 2014).unpublished
    (granting review on the question: “Whether this Court should replace the strict liability analysis of Section 402A of the Second Restatement with the analysis of the Third Restatement)
  • James Jackson v. Louisville Ladder Inc, 586 F. App'x 882 (3d Cir. 2014).unpublished
    That Court has also directed the parties in that case “to brief the question of whether, if the Court were to adopt the Third Restatement, that holding should be applied prospectively or retroactively.” Id. at 626-27.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission o/b/o Robin Garner
v.
John SMOCZYLO
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 25, 2013.
Published opinion
64 A.3d 626
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2013, the Orders of the Commonwealth Court are hereby AFFIRMED.