Leonard M. Harrell v. Doyle Alva Wester, 861 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Leonard M. Harrell v. Doyle Alva Wester, 861 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Cited for
At page 1549 cited at this page2 citing cases
At page 1550 noting that, in "light of the important federal policy favoring the existence of collective-bargaining agreements,” contract law "may be given a liberal interpretation1 citing case1 citing court put it this way
At page 1551 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Turner Indus. Grp., LLC v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 450, 8 F. Supp. 3d 875 (S.D. Tex. 2014).published
    Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the argument put forth by Local 450 here, 861 F.2d at 1551 (and cases cited therein) in light of TIG’s allegations that it "remitted working dues and apprenticeship funds contributions” for Local 406…
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leonard M. HARRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Doyle Alva WESTER, Eugenia W. Pelt and Billy Wester Dickson, Defendants, Pencie W. Wester, Defendant-Appellant
87-3716.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Dec 27, 1988.
Published opinion
861 F.2d 1546
1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18067
1988 WL 130209
J. Paul Griffith, Griffith & Griffith, Frank A. Baker, Marianna, Fla., for defendant-appellant., Ben Kirbo, Bainbridge, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
Tjoflat, Vance, Cox.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: #49,178 of 633,719
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion August 29, 1988, 11 Cir., 853 F.2d 828).

Before TJOFLAT, VANCE and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

On petition for rehearing appellee brings to our attention that the award by the district court that was the subject of this appeal included only $84,285.55 attributable to the proceeds of 284.43 acres of undistributed estate lands ordered to be conveyed to the plaintiff. The remaining $13,788.72 was awarded to the plaintiff in connection with a matter not directly related to the subject of this appeal and is not affected by our decision in this case.

Accordingly our opinion is modified to reverse only so much of the district court award as is equal to $84,285.55. The petition for rehearing is otherwise DENIED.