At page 1549 cited at this page2 citing cases
- Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Kirk Line, Indian River Transp., Inc., Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Kirk Line, Eller & Co., Inc., Indian River Transp., Inc., Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Kirk Line, R.B. Kirkconnell & Bro. Ltd., Indian River Transp., Inc., Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Kirk Line, R.B. Kirkconnell & Bro., Ltd., Jamaica Merch. Marine Atl. Line Ltd., Indian River Transp., Inc., Ss Morant Bay, Its Engines, Boilers, Etc., Eller & Co., Inc., Indian River Transp., Inc., Cross-Appellees, 877 F.2d 1508 (11th Cir. 1989).publishedInt'l, 861 F.2d 1546, 1549 (11th Cir.1988).
- Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Kirk Line, 877 F.2d 1508 (11th Cir. 1989).publishedInt’l, 861 F.2d 1546, 1549 (11th Cir.1988).
At page 1550 noting that, in "light of the important federal policy favoring the existence of collective-bargaining agreements,” contract law "may be given a liberal interpretation1 citing case
- Local 107 Off. & Prof'l Employees Int'l Union v. Offshore Logistics, Inc., 380 F.3d 832 (5th Cir. 2004).published(noting that, in "light of the important federal policy favoring the existence of collective-bargaining agreements,” contract law "may be given a liberal interpretation)
At page 1551 cited at this page1 citing case
- Turner Indus. Grp., LLC v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 450, 8 F. Supp. 3d 875 (S.D. Tex. 2014).publishedMoreover, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the argument put forth by Local 450 here, 861 F.2d at 1551 (and cases cited therein) in light of TIG’s allegations that it "remitted working dues and apprenticeship funds contributions” for Local 406…
Other citing cases
- United Paperworkers Int'l Union v. Int'l Paper Co., 920 F.2d 852 (11th Cir. 1991).published
- No. 89-7581, 920 F.2d 852 (11th Cir. 1991).published
- Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. E. Pilots Merger Comm., Inc., 484 F.3d 173 (3d Cir. 2007).published
v.
Doyle Alva WESTER, Eugenia W. Pelt and Billy Wester Dickson, Defendants, Pencie W. Wester, Defendant-Appellant
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion August 29, 1988, 11 Cir., 853 F.2d 828).
Before TJOFLAT, VANCE and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:On petition for rehearing appellee brings to our attention that the award by the district court that was the subject of this appeal included only $84,285.55 attributable to the proceeds of 284.43 acres of undistributed estate lands ordered to be conveyed to the plaintiff. The remaining $13,788.72 was awarded to the plaintiff in connection with a matter not directly related to the subject of this appeal and is not affected by our decision in this case.
Accordingly our opinion is modified to reverse only so much of the district court award as is equal to $84,285.55. The petition for rehearing is otherwise DENIED.