State v. McCallister, 780 S.W.2d 82 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989). · Go Syfert
State v. McCallister, 780 S.W.2d 82 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent
v.
Jerry McCALLISTER, Defendant-Appellant Jerry McCALLISTER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent
Nos. 55342, 56331.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Oct 17, 1989.
Published opinion
780 S.W.2d 82
1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1483
1989 WL 122597
Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, for defendant-appellant., William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Ronald L. Jurgeson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Published

ORDER

A jury convicted defendant of involuntary manslaughter, § 565.024, RSMo 1986, and assessed punishment at seven years plus a fine to be set by the court; the court sentenced defendant to seven years’ imprisonment and fined him $5,000. Defendant appeals both from his conviction and from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We find no prejudicial error on direct appeal and that the findings and conclusions denying his Rule 29.15 motion are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgments pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b) respectively.