Shelley v. Arrow Motors, Inc., 955 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Shelley v. Arrow Motors, Inc., 955 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael SHELLEY, Defendant/Respondent
v.
ARROW MOTORS, INC., Third Party
No. 71368.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 11, 1997.
Published opinion
955 S.W.2d 805
1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1933
1997 WL 700907
William F. Whealen, Jr., Miller & Steeno, P.C., Clayton, for third party defendant/appellant., James F. McMullin, Clayton, for defendant&61respondent.
Crane, Dowd, Russell.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for plaintiff in a fraudulent misrepresentation case. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).