Rhodes v. Westoak Realty, 955 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). · Go Syfert
Rhodes v. Westoak Realty, 955 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sandra RHODES
v.
WESTOAK REALTY
No. 72208.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 18, 1997.
Published opinion
955 S.W.2d 827
1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1990
1997 WL 713420
Elbert A. Walton, Jr., St. Louis, for appellants., Robert C. Jones, Jr., Jones, Korum, Wal-trip & Jones, Clayton, for respondents.
Gaertner, Grimm, Pudlowski.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Sandra Rhodes, Gennean Gillespie, and Otis Beekum (“plaintiffs”), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis dismissing their petition filed against respondents, Westoak Realty & Investment, Inc., and Robert C. Jones (“defendants”), for failure to state a claim.

As an initial matter, this Court must determine whether it has jurisdiction to entertain the issues raised before it. Skaggs v. Skaggs, 938 S.W.2d 302 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). In order to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction, the parties must appeal a written decree or order which has been signed by the trial judge and denominated a “judgment.” Rule 74.01(a); City of St. Louis v. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d 850, 853 (Mo.banc 1997). Such designation may appear at the top of the document, in the body of the writing, or in the form of a docket entry. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d at 853, The record before us laeks any indication the order entered by the trial court was designated a “judgment” as required for appeals purposes. See id. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Based on the foregoing, the appeal is dismissed.