Crosby v. Dir. of Revenue, 971 S.W.2d 365 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Crosby v. Dir. of Revenue, 971 S.W.2d 365 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David L. CROSBY
v.
DIRECTOR OF REVENUE
No. 73388.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jul 21, 1998.
Published opinion
971 S.W.2d 365
1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1399
1998 WL 404484
Frank J. Niesen, Jr, St. Louis, for appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nadia Termanini, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Dowd, Karohl, Pudlowski.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Licensee appeals judgment after a trial de novo of a driver’s license administrative suspension for operating a motor vehicle with a .10% or greater blood alcohol content. The sole issue is whether Director of Revenue offered evidence to support a finding the testing officer was a type III permit holder as required by department of health regulations and Sellenriek v. Director of Revenue, 826 S.W.2d 338, 340-341 (Mo. banc 1992). Exhibit B was admitted over a general hearsay objection. It included an operational checklist which was prepared by the testing officer and included his permit number and future expiration date. The exhibit was admissible, section 490.680 RSMo 1994, and sufficient to meet Director of Revenue’s burden of proof. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).