State v. Tinker, 980 S.W.2d 158 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Tinker, 980 S.W.2d 158 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
v.
Bennie TINKER, Defendant/Appellant Bennie TINKER, Movant/Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Nos. 69684, 73177.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 10, 1998.
Published opinion
980 S.W.2d 158
1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2008
1998 WL 778247
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Crane, Mooney, Simon.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a motor vehicle with an altered vehicle identification number, in violation of Section 301.390 RSMo (1994), and receiving stolen property, in violation of Section 570.080 RSMo (1994), on which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to consecutive terms of five years and seven years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from an order denying on the merits, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion. However, defendant has abandoned this appeal by failing to brief any errors with respect to the denial of post-conviction relief.

With respect to the direct appeal, no error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).